| Michael Prokurat, Alexander Golitzin, Michael D. Peterson Скачать epub pdf FLORENSKY, PAVEL A FLORENSKY, PAVEL A., priest, theologian, scientist (1882-ca. 1946). Florensky, very popular in post-Soviet Russian Christian circles, is known primarily as a multidisciplined theoretician and metaphysician who maintained his identity as a Christian and priest in academe and society at large in the face of Soviet persecution. His primary theological works included a number of journal articles and the book The Pillar and Foundation of Truth. His contributions to the humanities and science remind one of Leonardo da Vinci: Fictions in Geometry, astronomical calculations of a geocentric conception of the universe, The Doctrine of Dielectrics, monographs on the history of art with a focus on wood carving, Moscow Soviet Arts School professor of perspectival painting, musician, inventor of ‘dekanite’ (non-coagulating machine oil), etc. Just as with Vladimir Soloviev and Sergius Bulgakov (qq.v.), Florensky’s metaphysics centers on sophiology-to the extent that he speaks of Sophia (Wisdom) as a fourth divine hypostasis (person), and it appears to function as a mediating principle between God (q.v.) and creation, among other things. For this position his entire theology has been called into question (Georges Florovsky [q.v.]) and described as unfounded in Eastern tradition and overly speculative. Florensky was repeatedly imprisoned by the Soviets in the Solovki concentration camp, insisting that he renounce his priesthood. (When he occupied a chief post on the Commission for Electrification and attended the Supreme Soviet for National Economy, he always wore his cassock.) After his last ten-year term of imprisonment, he “disappeared” in the Soviet Union in 1946 and was unofficially reported dead to the European emigre community. It is assumed that he was one of the millions of silent martyrs (q.v.) who died under Stalin. Читать далее Источник: The A to Z of the Orthodox Church/Michael Prokurat, Alexander Golitzin, Michael D. Peterson - Scarecrow Press, 2010. - 462 p. ISBN 1461664039 Поделиться ссылкой на выделенное |
| ZurcherE. Confucian and Christian Religiosity in Late Ming China. – The Catholic Historical Rev. Wash. October 1997, vol. LXXXIII, 4 . Zurcher E. Jesuit Accomodation and the Chinese Cultural Imperative. – The Chinese Rites Controversy: Its History and Meaning. Ed. by D.E.Mungello. Nettetal, 1994. Zurcher E. From “Jesuit Studies” to “Western Learning”. – Europe Studies China. Papers from an International Conference on The History of European Sinology. L., 1995. Zurcher E. hejesuit Mission in Fujian in Late Ming Times: Levels of Response. – Development and Decline of Fukien Province in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Ed. by E.B.Vermeer. Leiden, 1990. Zetzsche J. The Bible in China. History of the Union Version, or the Culmination of Protestant Missionary Bible Translation in China. Sankt Augustin–Nettetal, 1999 (Monumenta Serica Monograph Series. Vol. XLV). Zetzsche J. The Work of Lifetimes: Why the “Union Version” Took Nearly Three Decades to Complete. – Bible in Modern China: the Literary and Intellectual Impact. Ed. by I.Eber. Nettetal, 1999. Ань Симэн. Цзинцзяо цзай Тан чао шуайло дэ юаньинь (Причины упадка несторианства при династии Тан). – Шэхуэй кэсюэ бао (Шанхай). 03.05.1992(3) ФИБК1ДЛ–УШЛЦЦ. 1992, 2. Ван Жуншэн, Гун Сыжэнь. Тайпин тяньго дэ шандицзяо (Религия Шанди у тайпинов). – Тайпин тяньго сюэкань. Вып. 2. Пекин, 1985. Ван Лисинь. Ин Мэй чуаньцзяоши юй цзиньдай Чжун Си вэньхуа хуэйтун (Англо–американские миссионеры и взаимопроникновение культур Китая и Запада в новое время). – Шицзе цзунцзяо яньцзю. 1997, 2. Ван Мэйсю Дин Вэйлян дэ Чжунго цзунцзяо гуань (Взгляд В А.П.Мартина на китайские религии). – Бэйцзин дасюэ сюэбао. 1995, 2. ФИБКЦЛ–ЦЦ. 1995 . 3. Ван Мэйсю Сифан дэ Чжунго цзиду цзунцзяо яньцзю (Западные исследования китайского христианства). – Шицзе цзунцзяо яньцзю. 1995, 4. ФИБКЦЛ–ЦЦ. 1996, 1. Ван Цинчэн. Тайпин тяньго дэ лиши хэ сысян (История и идеология тай–пинского государства). Пекин, 1985. Вэн Шаоцзюнь (сост.). Ханьюй цзинцзяо вэньдянь цюаньши (Китайско–язычные несторианские каноны с комментариями). Гонконг, 1995. |
| Ч. I, И. М., 2001; Ч. III. М., 2002. Шёнборн К. Икона Христа. Богословские основы/Пер. с нем. Е. М. Верещагин. Милан-М., 1999. Alexander Р. ]. The Iconoclastic Council of St. Sophia (815) and Its Definition (Horos)//Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 7, 1953. Pp. 37–66. Alexander P. J. The Patriarch Nicephorus of Constantinoplë Ecclesiastical Policy and Image Worship in the Byzantine Empire. Oxford, 1958. Baranov V. The Theology of Byzantine Iconoclasm (726–843): A Study in Theological Method. Medieval Studies Department. Central-European University. Budapest, 2002. (Diss.). Beck H. G. Kirche und theologische Literatur im Byzantinischen Reich. Munchen, 1959. Brubaker L., Haldon J. Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era (ca. 680–850): the Sources. An annotaded survey. Aldershot, Burlington, Singapore, Sydney, 2001. (Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Monographs 7). Fatouros С. free.). Theodori Studitae epistulae. Vol. 1–2. Berlin, New-York, 1992. (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, Series Be-rolinensis 31). Gero S. Byzantine Iconoclasm during the reign of Constantine V, with particular attention to the oriental sources. Louvain, 1977. (Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium 384, Subs. 52). Krannich Т., Schubert Chr., Sode Cl. (Hrsg.), Die ikonoklastiche Syn-ode von Hiereia 754. Tubingen, 2002. (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 15). Lemerle P. Le Premier humanisme byzantin. Notes et remarques sur enseignement et culture a Byzance des origines au Xe siecle. Paris, 1971. (Bibliotheque Byzantinë Etudes 6). Ulie K-J. (Hrsg.). Die Patriarchen der ikonoklastischen Zcit. Ger-manos I. – Methodios I. (715–847). Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, New-York, Paris, Wien, 1999. (Berliner byzantinistische Studien 5). Ulie K-J., Ludwig C., Pratsch Th., Rochow I. (Hrsg.). Prosopographie der Mittelbyzantinischen Zeit. Erste Abteilung (641–867). Berlin, 1998. Pratsch Th. Theodoros Studites (759–826) – zwischen Dogma und Pragma. Der Abt des Studiosklosters in Konstantinopel im Spannungs-feld von Patriarch, Kaiser und eigenem Anspruch. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, New-York, Paris, Wien, 1998. (Berliner byzantinistische Studien 4). |
| Ср.: Nastasi D. Imperial Claims in the Romanian Principalities//The Byzantine Legacy in Eastern Europe/Clueas L., ed. (Eastern European Monographs, 230). [Boulder (CO), 1988]. P. 200. 586 Ср.: Второе послание митрополита Киприана прп. Сергию Радонежскому (РИБ VI, кол. 181; англ. пер.: Meyendorff J. Byzantium and the Rise of Russia. P. 297 [ Мейендорф И. Византия и Московская Русь. С. 541]); ср.: Rhalles Potles. V. 5. P. 305; Соколов П. Русский архиерей из Византии. Киев, 1913. С. 536. Большинство авторов полагают – на мой взгляд, ошибочно, – что Антоний занимал кафедру до 1391 года. 587 Он странствовал по Палестине, Сирии, Малой Азии, Грузии и Балканам, рукополагая «епископов». О его жизненном пути см.: Loenertz R. – J. Cardinal Morosini et Paul Paleologue Tagaris, patriarches//REB 24 (1966). P. 224–256; Nicol D.M. The Confessions of a Bogus Patriarch: Paul Tagaris Palaiologos, Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople in the Fourteenth Century//JEH 21 (1970). P. 289–299 (переизд. в: Idem. Byzantium: Its Ecclesiastical History and Relations with the Western World. London, 1972). 592 Ср.: Obolensky D. A Byzantine Grand Embassy to Russia in 1400//BMGS 4 (1978). P. 123–132 (переизд.: Idem. The Byzantine Inheritance of Eastern Europe. London, 1982). 593 Более подробно об истории этих событий см.: Istoria Bisericii Romani. Vol. I. P. 144–162, 171–190; Арсений [Стадницкий], en. Исследования и монографии по истории Молдавской Церкви. СПб., 1904; Obolensky D. A Late Fourteenth–Century Byzantine Diplomat: Michael, Archbishop of Bethlehem//Byzance et les Slaves. Melanges Ivan Dujcev/Dufrenne S.P. ed., 1970. P. 299–315 (переизд.: Obolensky D. The Byzantine Inheritance of Eastern Europe); Stanescu E. Byzance et les pays roumains aux IXe–XVe ss.//Actes du XIV Congres International des Etudes Byzantines 1. Bucharest, 1974. P. 419–420. О связях с Галицией см. также: Meyendorff J. Byzantium and the Rise of Russia. P. 249–251 [ Мейендорф И. Византия и Московская Русь. С. 505–506]. 594 Obolensky D. Byzantine Commonwealth. P. 331. [Оболенский Д. Византийское Содружество наций; Шесть византийских портретов. С. 353]. 596 Ср.: Иванова К. Болгарская переводная литература X–XIV вв. в контексте Slavia orthodoxa//Studia Slavica Mediaevalia et Humanistica Ricardo Picchio dicata/Colucci М., Dell’Agata G., Goldblatt H., eds. Roma, 1986. Vol. II. P. 362. См. также: Бегунов Ж. Академик H.K. Никольский о Григории Цамблаке//Ibid. Vol. I. P. 19–21. |
| 1990. Asia Before Europe: Economy and Civilization of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chauhan, Gian Ghand. 2003. An Economic history of early medieval northern India. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers. Ch " en, Kenneth K.S.I 964. Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Choksy, Jamsheed К. 1988. “Loan and sales contracts in ancient and early medieval Iran.” Indo-Iranian Jour-nal31(3): 191–218. Cipolla, Carlo M. 1967. Money, Prices and Civilisation in the Mediterranean World: Fifth to Seventeenth Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Clanchy. M. T. 1993. From memory to written record, England 1066–1307. Oxford: Blackwell. Clarence-Smith, William G. 2008. “Islamic Abolitionism in the Western Indian Ocean from с. 1800.” Presented at the conference, Slavery and the Slave Trades in the Indian Ocean and Arab Worlds: Global Connections and Disconnections, Yale University, November 7–8,2008. Clavero, Bartolome. 1986. “The jurisprudence on usury as a social paradigm in the history of Europe.” In Historische Soziologie der Rechtswissenschaft(Erik Volkmar Heyen, editor), pp. 23–36. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann. Codere, Helen. 1950. Fighting with Property: A Study of Kwakiutl Potlatching and Warfare 1792–1930. Monograph 18. New York: American Ethnological Society. Cohen, David. 1987. “Seclusion, separation and the status of women in classical Athens.” Greece and Rome 36(1): 1-15. Cohen, Edward E. 1995. Review of Lending and Borrowing in Ancient Athens " , Bryn Mawr Classical Review 3 (4) Cohn, Norman. 1972. The pursuit of the millennium: revolutionary millenarians and mystical anarchists of the Middle Ages. New York: Oxford University Press. Cole, Alan. 1998. Mothers and Sons in Chinese Buddhism. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Coleman, Janet. 1985. “Dominium in 13th and 14th Century Political Thought and its 17th Century Heirs. John of Paris and Locke.” Political Studies 33:73-100. |
| Metropolitan Hilarion takes part in international academic conference in Minsk April 6, 2013 On 5 April 2013, an international academic conference on ‘Role of the Edict of Milan in the History of the European Civilization and Topical Issues of Church-State Relations Today’ was held at the Institute of Theology of the Belarusian State University. Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations, rector of the Ss Cyril and Methodius Theological Institute for Post-Graduate and Doctoral Studies, chairman of the Synodal Biblical and Theological Commission, took part in the conference with the blessing of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia and at the invitation of Metropolitan Philaret of Minsk and Slutsk, Patriarchal Exarch for All Belarus. The conference was preceded by an enlarged meeting of the Council of the Institute of Theology, chaired by His Eminence Metropolitan Philaret. Members of the Council unanimously resolved to honour Metropolitan Hilarion the degree of doctor honoris causa of the Institute of Theology of the Belarusian State University “for his outstanding contribution to theology and education and for strengthening inter-Christian and inter-Faith cooperation.” The doctor honoris causa was greeted by Metropolitan Philaret of Minsk and Slutsk and by Mr. Sergei Ablameiko, rector of the University, who especially noted that the Belarusian State University had long known Metropolitan Hilarion as a gifted theologian and church historian, author of monographs dedicated to life and teaching of the Church Fathers and author of the works on dogmatics.” The conference opened with the report of the DECR chairman who cordially thanked Metropolitan Philaret and the Council for the honour. Addressing Metropolitan Philaret, Metropolitan Hilarion said, “You became the head of the Minsk diocese thirty-five years ago and began your ministry in the most atheistic Republic of the Soviet Union. Now, thanks to your selfless work, Orthodoxy has revived in the Belarusian land and has become its strong spiritual and moral force.” |
| Paulos Gregorios. A Light Too Bright: The Enlightenment Today: An Assessment of the Values of the European Enlightenment and a Search for New Foundations. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992. 261 p. (SUNY series in religious studies.) Includes bibliographical references (p. 237 –252) and index. Pelikan, Jaroslav Jan. The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971–1989. 5 v. Contents: 1. The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100–600). 2. The Spirit of Eastern Christendom (600–1700). 3. The Growth of Medieval Theology (600–1300). 4. Reformation of Church and Dogma (1300–1700). 5. Christian Doctrine and Modern Culture (Since 1700). Poppe, Andrzej. The Rise of Christian Russia. London: Variorum Reprints, 1982. 346 p. in various pagings. (Variorum reprint; CS157.) Reprint of articles originally published, 1965–1981. Pospielovsky, Dimitry. Russian Church Under the Soviet Regime, 1917–1982. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1984. 2 v. (535 p.) Bibliography: p. 501–516. -. Soviet Studies on the Church and the Believer’s Response to Atheism. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan, 1988. xxxii, 325 p., p. of plates (A History of Soviet atheism in theory and practice, and the believer; v. 3.) Bibliography: p. 307–315. Pritsak, Omeljan. The Origin of Rus’. Cambridge, MA: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, 1981-, v. 1-. (Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute monograph series.) Bibliography: v. 1, p. 725–835. Religious World of Russian Culture. Andrew Blane, editor. The Hague: Mouton, 1975. 359 p. (Russia and Orthodoxy; v. 2.) (Slavistic printings and reprintings; 260/2.) English, French, German, or Russian. Essays dedicated to Fr. G. V. Florovsky. Riasanovsky, Nicholas Valentine. A History of Russia. 5th ed. NY: Oxford University Press, 1993. xx, 711 p., 24 p. of plates. Bibliographical references: p. 613–628. Runciman, Steven. The Byzantine Theocracy. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1977. viii, 197 p. |
| P. 131–153. Jenkins D. (2017) «Michael Psellos». The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium. Ed. by A. Kaldellis, N. Siniossoglou. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 447–462. Lernould A. (2012) «Nature in Proclus: from irrational immanent principle to goddess». Neoplatonism and the philosophy of nature. Ed. by J. Wilberding and Ch. Horn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 68–103. Michael Psellos (2008) Kommentar zur Physik des Aristoteles. Einleitung, text, indices von Linos G. Benakis. Athenis: Akademia Atheniensis (Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi. Commentaria in Aristotelem Byzantina. Vol. 5). Minio-Pauello L., ed. (1974) Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Niehoff-Panagiotidis J. (2016) «Le système éducatif à Byzance ou pourquoi les Byzantins n’ont pas développé une formation universitaire comme en Occident?» Schüler und Meister. Hrsg. von A. Speer, Th. Jeschke. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter (Miscellanea Mediaevalia. Bd. 39). P. 389–406. Overduin F. (1977) Nicander of Colophon’s Theriaka: a literary commentary. Leiden: Brill (Mnemosyne. Suppl. 374). Papaioannou S. (2012) «Rhetoric and the Philosopher in Byzantium». The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy. Ed. by B. Byden, K. Ierodiakonou. Athens: The Norwegian Institute at Athens (Papers and monographs from the Norwegian Institute at Athens. Series 4. Vol. 1). P. 171–199. Ross W. D., ed. (1950) Aristotelis Physica. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ross W. D., ed. (1963) Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Schabel C. (2006) «Haec ille: Citation, Quotation, and Plagiarism in 14 th Century Schlasticism». The Origins of European Scholarship. The Cyprus Millenium Conference. Ed. by I. Taifacos. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. P. 163–175. Schenkel H., ed. (1900) Themistius in Aristotelis Physica Paraphrasis. Berlin: Reimer (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Vol. V. Pars 2). Speck P. (1974) Die kaiserliche Universität von Konstantinopel. Präzisierungen zur Frage des höheren Schulwesens in Byzanz im 9. und 10. Jahrhundert. Munich: C. H. Beck (Byzantinisches Archiv. Bd. 14). |
| 11. Benson W.M., Stefko P.L., Randall L.O. Comparative pharmacology of levorphan, racemorphan and dextrorphan and related methyl ethers//Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics. - 1953. - Vol. 109, 2. - P. 189-200 12. Boyer E.W. Dextromethorphan abuse//Pediatric Emergency Care. - 2004. - Vol.20. - - P. 858-863 13. Bryner J.K., Wang U.K., Hui J.W., Bedodo M., MacDougall C., Anderson I.B. Dextromethorphan abuse in adolescence: an increasing trend: 1999-2004//Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. - 2006. - Vol.160. - - P. 1217-1222 14. Desai S., Aldea D., Daneels E., Soliman M., Braksmajer A.S., Kopes-Kerr C.P. Chronic addiction to dextromethorphan cough syrup: a case report//The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. - 2006. - Vol.19. - - P. 320-323. 15. Erden B.F., Ozdemirci S., Yildiran G., Utkan T., Gacar N., Ulak G. Dextromethorhan attenuates ethanol withdrawal syndrome in rats//Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. - 1999. - Vol. 62. - - P. 537-541 16. Hinsberger A., Sharma V., Mazmanian D. Cognitive deterioration from long-term abuse of dextromethorphan: a case report//J. Psychiatry Neurosci. - 1994. - Vol.19. - - P. 375-377 17. International Programme on Chemical Safety Poisons. Information Monograph (IPCS) 179, 1996 18. Jacob J.E., Wagner M.L., Sage J.I. Safety of Selegiline with Cold Medications//The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. - 2003. - Vol.37. - - P. 438-441 19. Karlsson M.O., Dahlstrom B., Neil A. Characterization of high-affinity binding sites for the antitussive noscapine in guinea pig brain tissue//The European Journal of Pharmacology. - 1988. - Vol. 145. - - P. 195-203 20. Litovitz T.L., Bailey K.M., Schmitz B.F. et al. American Association of Poison Control Centers National Data Collection System//American Journal of Emergency Medicine. - 1991. - Vol.9. - 5. - P. 461-509 21. Manaboriboon B., Chomchai C. Dextromethorphan abuse in Thai adolescents: A report of two cases and review of literature//Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. - 2005. - 88. - P. 242-245 |
| According to Russian texts, the principal landmarks of Indian history were the travels of Alexander the Great and the mission in India of Apostle Thomas. The section purports to elucidate the cultural milieu and the common style of historico-cultural thinking as prerequisites for understanding the image of ancient India in the specific region of medieval Europe. This is followed by transgression into the history of the creation and genre specifics of the literary works which disseminated some or other information about ancient India in Russia; no differentiation between the realistic and mythological interpretation is made at this stage, the task being to reveal the principal nerve of Russian comprehension of India. The information that a Russian reader could obtain from these sources is systematized according to the principles of modern regional science, i. e. starting with geography and natural characteristics and ending with religious traditions. This done, the information is suject to historical criticism, followed by an evaluation of what a Russian could surmise from all those numerous facts. The dualistic image was the main element of this vision of India: unlike his modern counterpart, the medieval reader conceived India as two mutually complimenting yet opposed regions – one of the Brahmans (or Rahmans, as they were known in Russia) and the other of Indians. The sources of this differentiation are traced on the basis of certain elements in the antique characteristic of that country and its special structuralization in medieval consciousness. Thus, the conception in the Russian texts of the Rahmans as a freedom-loving group opposed to the Macedonians is related to the historical information concerning Alexander " s campaign and to the available knowledge of Indian republics. f A major place in the monograph is reserved for the material related to the identification of Indian hymnosophists (nagomud-retsy in Russian). Among the treatises dealing with this subject are the essay On the Races of India and the Brahmans by Palla-dius, the story Alexandria and The Chronicles by Georgi Amartolr whose account of the life of Indian ascetics was rewritten to become A Narrative of the Rahmans and Their Amazing Life, as well as apocryphal Visit of Zosima to the Rahmans. A comparative analysis of data on historical religions and ascetic orders of ancient India led to the conclusion that nucleus of the prototype of this image of the Rahman comprized some characteristics of ancient Indian mystics, the Axjivikas above all. |
|
|
