| PlanEpist Maximi monachi Planudis epistulae, ed. P.A.M.Leone. Amsterdam 1991. [ca 1300] PlanId Maximi Planudis Idyllium, rec. Ph.Pontani. Università di Padova, Ist. di studi biz. e neogreci, Quaderni 7. Padova 1973. [ca 1300] PlanOv Publii Ovidii Nasonis Metamorphoseon libri XV graece versi a Maximo Planude, ed. J.F.Boissonade. Paris 1822. [ca 1300] PlanSprich Die Sprichwörtersammlung des Maximus Planudes, erläutert von E.Kurtz. Leipzig 1886. [ca 1300] PLaur Dai Papiri della Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, ed. R.Pintaudi. I–IV. Firenze 1976–1983. PLBatXXV Papyri, ostraca ... in the Leiden Papyrological Institute, ed. F.A.J.Hoogendijk and P.van Minnen. Leiden 1991. Plethon Pléthon, Traité des Lois, ed. C.Alexandre. Paris 1858. [seitengleicher ND in R.Brague, Pléthon. Traité des Lois. Paris 1982] [s.XV] PLond Greek Papyri in the British Museum. I– . London 1893– " > Greek Papyri in the British Museum. I– . London 1893– (siehe auch PAphr). PlusDial Johannes Plusiadenos, Dialexis. PG 159,960–1024. [s.XV] PMich Michigan Papyri. I– . Ann Arbor 1931– . PMonac Die Papyri der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek München. Griechische Papyri I–III. Stuttgart 1986. PNaqlun I T.Derda, Deir El-Naqlun: The Greek Papyri. Warszawa 1995. PoemApost G.Schirò, Un poemetto bizantino inedito per gli apostoli Pietro e Paolo. Atti Ist. Veneto, Cl. Scienze mor. e lett. 115 (1956/7) 187–209. [ca 1200] PoemAstr E.Miller, Poèmes astronomiques de Théodore Prodrome et de Jean Camatère. Notices et extraits XXIII 2. Paris 1872. [s.XII] PoemMor E.Miller, Poème moral de Constantin Manassès. Annuaire Assoc. ét. gr. 9 (1875) 23–75. [s.XIII?] PoesSal A.Acconcia Longo, Un nuovo codice con poesie salentine (Laur. 58,25) e l’assedio di Gallipoli del 1268–69. RSBN N.S.20–21 (30–31) (1983–1984) 123–170. [s.XIII] PoetItal G.Luongo, Due preghiere in versi di un poeta italobizantino. Annali fac. lett. Univ. Napoli 22 (1979–1980) 77–176. [s.XII] PoetOtr Poeti bizantini di Terra d’Otranto nel secolo XIII, ed. M.Gigante. Napoli 1979 (Index 217–242). [s.XIII] |
| Handbook of Patristic Exegesis. The Bible in Ancien Christianity. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2004. V. 1. 668 p. V. 2. 827 p.; Simonetti M. Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church. An Historical Introduction to Patristic Exegesis. Edinburg, 154 p. О методах представителей Александрийской школы см. сведения в фундаментальном исследовании: Саврей В. Л. Александрийская школа в истории философско-богословской мысли. 3-е изд. М., 1008 с. Подробный список современных западных исследований по святоотеческой экзегезе библейских книг, см. в издании: Sieben H.J. Exegesis Patrum. Saggio bibliografico sull’esegesi biblica dei Padri della Chiesa. Roma, 1983. 150 p. Конкретные примеры святоотеческой экзегезы можно найти в книге: Поликарпов Д. , прот. Толкования святых отцов и учителей Церкви и богослужебные песнопения на мессианские места Библии: Книги законоположительные и исторические. СПб., 1914. с. 435 Подробнее о понимании богодухновенности церковными авторами см. серию статей Д.С. Леонардова: Леонардов Д.С. Учение о богодухновенности Священного Писания мужей апостольских//Вера и разум. 1898. 5. С. 286–302; Леонардов Д.С. Учение о богодухновенности Священного Писания апологетов II века//Вера и разум. 1901. 9. С. 55911 ;580. С. 722–750; 13. С. 25–54; Леонардов Д.С. Теория богодухновенности в александрийской школе: Теория Климента Александрийского //Вера и разум. 1906. 1. С. 172 ;30. С. 70–94; 3. С. 132–150; 4. С. 375–404; Леонардов Д.С. Теория богодухновенности в александрийской школе: Теория Оригена //Вера и разум. 1907. 4. С. 443–465; 5. С. 583–600; 6. С. 764– 774; 9. С. 330–348; 12. С. 765–788; 18. С. 711–736; Леонардов Д.С. Учение свт. Иоанна Златоуста о богодухновенности Библии//Вера и разум. 1912. С. 3444 ;376. С. 429–448; 5. С. 606–627; 7. С. 69–93; 8. С. 185–205; 9. С. 319–342; 10. С. 464–480; 11. С. 604–626; 12. С. 737–758. 436 Kannengiesser Ch. Handbook of Patristic Exegesis. The Bible in Ancien Christianity. V. 1. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2004. P. 167. 438 Об использовании данного метода свт. |
| Vol. 9. P. 223-260; Eichner W. Die Nachrichten über den Islam bei den Byzantinern//Der Islam. B., 1936. Bd. 23. N 3. S. 133-162; N 4. S. 197-244; Meyendorff J. Byzantine Views of Islam//DOP. 1964. Vol. 28. P. 113-132; Khoury A.-T. Les théologiens byzantins et l " Islam: Textes et auteurs (VIIIe-XIIIe s.). Louvain; P., 19692; idem. Polémique byzantine contre l " Islam (VIIIe-XIIIe s.). Leiden, 1972; idem. Apologétique byzantine contre l " Islam (VIIIe-XIIIe s.). Altenberge, 1982; Demetriades J. M. Nicetas of Byzantium and His Encounter with Islam: A Study of the «Ανατροπ» and the two «Epistles» to Islam: Diss. Hartford, 1973; Abel A. Masques et visages dans la polémique islamo-chrétienne//Tavola rotonda sul tema: Christianesimo e islamismo, Roma, 17-18 Apr. 1972. R., 1974. P. 85-131; Trapp E. Gab es eine byzantinische Koranübersetzung?//Diptycha. 1981/1982. T. 2. S. 7-17; Versteegh K. Greek Translations of the Qur " an in Christian Polemics (9th Cent. A. D.)//ZDMG. 1991. Bd. 141. N 1. S. 52-68; Sahas D. J. «Holosphyros»?: A Byzantine Perception of «The God of Muhammad»//Christian-Muslim Encounters/Ed. Y. Y. Haddad, W. Z. Haddad. Gainesville, 1995. P. 109-125; Griffith S. H. Byzantium and the Christians in the World of Islam: Constantinople and the Church in the Holy Land in the 9th Cent.//Medieval Encounters. Leiden, 1997. Vol. 3. P. 231-265; Rigo A. Gli Ismaeliti e la discendenza da Abramo nella «Refutazione del Corano» di Niceta Byzantios (metà del IX secolo)//I nemici della crismianima/Ed. G. Ruggieri. Bologna, 1997. T. 2. P. 83-104; idem. Niceta Byzantios, la sua opera e il monaco Evodio//«In Partibus Clius»: Scritti in onore di G. Pugliese Carratelli/Ed. G. Fiaccadori. Napoli, 2006. P. 147-187; idem. Nicetas of Byzantium//Christian-Muslim Relations: A Bibliographical History. Leiden; Boston, 2009. Vol. 1: 600-900/Ed. D. Thomas, B. Roggema. P. 751-756. (The History of Christian-Muslim Relations; 11); Dorfmann-Lazarev I. Arméniens et Byzantins à l " époque de Photius: Deux débats théologiques après le Triomphe de l " orthodoxie. |
| Stuttg., 1967; Brown K. S. James: A Religio-Historical Study of the Relations between Jewish, Gnostic, and Catholic Christianity in the Early Period: Diss./Brown Univ. Providence (Rhod Island), 1972; Crossan J. D. Mark and the Relatives of Jesus//NTIQ. 1973. Vol. 15. P. 81-113; Catchpole D. R. Paul, James and the Apostolic Decree//NTS. 1976/1977. Vol. 23. P. 428-444; Bruce F. F. James and the Church of Jerusalem// Idem. Men and Movements in the Primitive Church. Exeter, 1977. P. 86-119; Howard G. Was James an Apostle?: A Reflection on a New Proposal for Gal 1. 19//NTIQ. 1977. Vol. 19. Fasc. 1. P. 63-64; Murphy-O " Connor J. Tradition and Redaction in 1 Cor 15. 3-7//CBQ. 1981. Vol. 43. P. 582-589; idem. Where was James Buried?//Bible Review. 2003. Vol. 19. N 3. P. 34-42; Scott J. J. James the Relative of Jesus and the Expectation of an Eschatological Priest//JETS. 1982. Vol. 25. P. 323-332; Eisenman R. H. Maccabees, Zadokites, Christians and Qumran. Leiden, 1983; idem. James the Just in the Habakkuk Pesher. Leiden, 1986; idem. James, the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls. N. Y., 1996; Hachlili R. Names and Nicknames of Jews in Second Temple Time//Eretz-Israel. 1984. Vol. 17. P. 188-211 (на ивр.); Pratscher W. Der Herrenbruder Jakobus und sein Kreis//EvTh. 1987. Bd. 47. S. 228-244; L ü demann G. Opposition to Paul in Jewish Christianity/Transl. M. E. Boring. Minneapolis, 1989; Bauckham R. J. The Brothers and Sisters of Jesus: An Epiphanian Response to J. P. Meier//CBQ. 1994. Vol. 56. N 4. P. 686-700; idem. For what Offence Was James Put to Death?//James the Just and Christian Origins/Ed. B. Chilton, C. A. Evans. Leiden; Boston; Köln, 1999. P. 199-232; Rahmani L. Y. A Catalogue of Jewish Ossuaries in the Collections of the State of Israel. Jerusalem, 1994; Painter J. Just James. Columbia, 1997; idem. Who Was James?//The Brother of Jesus/Ed. B. Chilton, J. Neusner. Louisville; L., 2001. P. 10-65; Holmberg B. |
| Vol. 5. N 4. P. 204-248; idem. «Tiefer Friede» (1. Klemens 2. 2)//Ibid. 1970. Vol. 24. N 4. P. 261-279; idem. Noch einmal «Tiefer Friede»//Ibid. 1972. Vol. 26. N 1. P. 24-28; idem. Two Notes on Irenaeus//Ibid. 1976. Vol. 30. N 3. P. 201-213; Eggenberger Chr. Die Quellen der politischen Ethik des 1. Klemensbriefes. Zürich, 1951; Botte B. St. Irénée et l " Épître de Clément//REAug. 1956. Vol. 2. P. 67-70; Stuiber A. Clemens Romanus I//RAC. 1957. Bd. 3. Col. 188-197; Ziegler A. W. Neue Studien zum ersten Klemensbrief. Münch., 1958; Gamber K. Das Papyrusfragment zur Markusliturgie und das Eucharistiegebet im Clemensbrief//OS. 1959. Bd. 8. S. 31-45; Vööbus A. Ein merkwürdiger Pentateuchtext in der pseudo-klementinischen Schrift «De virginitate»//Oriens Chr. 1959. Bd. 43. S. 54-58; Ullmann W. The Significance of the «Epistola Clementis» in the Pseudo-Clementines//JThSt. N. S. 1960. Vol. 11. P. 295-317; Kretschmar G. Ein Beitrag zur Frage nach dem Ursprung frühchristlicher Askese//ZTK. 1964. Bd. 61. S. 27-67; Bévenot M. Clement of Rome in Irenaeus " s Succession-List//JThSt. N. S. 1966. Vol. 17. P. 98-107; Beyschlag K. Clemens Romanus und der Frühkatholizismus: Untersuchungen zu 1. Clemens 1-7. Tüb., 1966; idem. Zur ερνη βαθεα (1 Clem. 2. 2)//VChr. 1972. Vol. 26. N 1. P. 18-23; Wright D. F. Clement and the Roman Succession in Irenaeus//JThSt. 1967. Vol. 18. P. 144-154; Jaubert A. Introd.// Clément de Rome. Epître aux Corinthiens. P., 1971, 2000r. P. 13-96. (SC; 167); Hagner D. A. The Use of the Old and New Testaments in Clement of Rome. Leiden, 1973; Donfried K. P. The Setting of Second Clement in Early Christianity. Leiden, 1974; Stegemann Chr. Herkunft und Entstehung des sogenannten zweiten Klemensbriefes: Diss. Bonn, 1974; Pietri Ch. Roma Christiana: Recherches sur l " Église de Rome, son organisation, sa politique, son idéologie de Miltiade à Sixte III (311-440). R., 1976. 2 vol.; Pergola Ph. La condamnation des Flaviens «Chrétiens» sous Domitien: Persécution religieuse ou répression à caractère politique?//Mélanges de l " École française de Rome: Antiquité. |
| The Hague, 1971; Walz A. Von Cajetans Gedanken über Kirche und Papst//Volk Gottes: Zum Kirchenverständnis der katholischen, evangelischen und anglikanischen Theologie. Freiburg etc., 1967. S. 336-360; McCanles M. Univocalism in Cajetan " s Doctrine of Analogy//The New Scholasticism. 1968. Vol. 42. N 1. P. 18-47; McNally R. Pope Adrian VI (1522-1523) and Church Reform//AHPont. 1969. Vol. 7. P. 253-285; Minnich N. H. Concepts of Reform Proposed at the Fifth Lateran Council//Ibid. P. 163-251; idem. The Participants at the Fifth Lateran Council//Ibid. 1974. Vol. 12. P. 157-206; Selge K.-V. Die Augsburger Begegnung von Luther und Kardinal Cajetan im Oktober 1518//Jb. der hessischen kirchengeschichtlichen Vereinigung. Darmstadt, 1969. Bd. 20. S. 37-54; Bodem A. Das Wesen der Kirche nach Kardinal Cajetan: Ein Beitrag zur Ekklesiologie im Zeitalter der Reformation. Trier, 1971; Gargan L. Lo Studio teologico e la bibliotheca dei domenicani a Padova nel Tre e Quattrocento. Padova, 1971; O " Malley J. W. Preaching for the Popes//The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion/Ed. Ch. Trinkaus, H. A. Oberman. Leiden, 1974. P. 408-440; O " Connell M. Cardinal Cajetan: Intellectual and Activist//The New Scholasticism. 1976. Vol. 50. N 3. P. 310-322; Roover R., de. Cardinal Cajetan on «Cambium» or Exchange Dealings//Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of P. O. Kristeller/Ed. E. P. Mahoney. Leiden, 1976. P. 423-433; Wicks J. Thomism between Renaissance and Reformation: The Case of Cajetan//ARG. 1977. Bd. 68. S. 9-32; idem., ed. Cajetan Responds: A Reader in Reformation Controversy. Wash., 1978; idem. Cajetan und die Anfänge der Reformation. Münster, 1983; idem. Fides sacramenti - Fides specialis: Luther " s Development in 1518//Gregorianum. R., 1984. Vol. 65. N 1. P. 53-87; idem. Thomas de Vio Cajetan (1469-1534)//The Reformation Theologians: An Introd. to Theology in the Early Modern Period/Ed. C. Lindberg. Oxf.; Malden, 2002. P. 269-283; Iserloh E., Hallensleben B. |
| Schäfer 1980=Schäfer P. Engel und Menschen in der Hekhalot-Literatur. – Kairos 22, 1980, 201–225 [=Idem. Hekhalot-Studien. Tübingen, 1988 (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 19), 250–276]. Schmid 1955=Schmid J. Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Apokalypse-Textes. I. Der Apokaplypse-Kommentar des Andreas von Kaisareia. 1. Text. München, 1955 (Münchener theologische Studien. I. Historische Abteilung. 1. Ergänzungsband). Schmid 1956=Schmid J. Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Apokalypse-Textes. I. Der Apokaplypse-Kommentar des Andreas von Kaisareia. 1a. Einleitung. Miinchen, 1956 (Münchener theologische Studien. I. Historische Abteilung. 1. Ergänzungsband). Schmitt 1992=Schmitt A. Die griechischen Danieltexte («θ» und ) und das Theodotionproblem. – Biblische Zeitschrift 36, 1992, 1–29. Schoedel 1993=Schoedel W.R. Papias. – ANRW ΙΙ.27.1, 235–270. Schoellgen 1985=Schoellgen G. Die Didache, ein frühes Zeugnis für Landgemeinden? – ZNTW 76, 1985, 140–143. Siegert 1981=Siegert F. Unbeachtete Papiaszitate bei armenischen Schriftstellern. – New Testament Studies 27, 1981, 605–614. Stommel 1953=Stommel E. Semeion ekpetaseos (Didache 16, 6). – Romische Quartalschrift 48, 1953, 21–42. Stone 1996=Stone M.E. Armenian Apocrypha relating to Adam and Eve. Edited with introductions, translations and commentary. Leiden, N.Y., Köln, 1996 (Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha 14). Strack–Billerbeck 1926=Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch von H.L. Strack und P.Billerbeck. Bd. 3. Die Briefe des Neuen Testaments und die Offenbarung Johannis. München, 1985s (19261). Stuckenbruck 1994=Stuckenbruck L.T. Angel Veneraition and Christology. A Study in Early Judaism and the Christology of the Apocalypse of John. Tübingen, 1994 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, II/70). Stuiber 1981=Stuiber A. Die drei σημεα von Didache XVI. – JbAC 24, 1981, 42–44. Taylor 1994=Taylor R.A. The Peshitta of Daniel. Leiden, N.Y., Köln, 1994 (Monographs of the Peshitta Institute, Leiden; 7) |
| Cherniss H. F. The Platonism of Gregory of Nyssa//University of California Publications in Classical Philology. Berkeley, 1930. Vol. II. 1. Clear E. V. Mc. The Fall of Man and the Original Sin in the Theology of St. Gregory of Nyssa//Theological Studies Baltimore, 1948. T. 9. P. 175–212. Comes de Castro M. Die Trinitatslehre des hi. Gregor von Nyssa. Freiburg-in-Brisgau, 1938. Daniélou J. Chrismation prebaptismale et divinité de l " Esprit chez Grégoire de Nysse//Recherches de Science Religieuse. Paris, 1968. T 56. P. 177–198. Daniélou J. La chronologie des oeuvres de Grégoire de Nysse//Studia Patristica. Berlin, 1966. T VII. P. 159–169. Daniélou J. La Θεωρα chez Grégoire de Nysse//Studia Patristica. Berlin, 1972. T. XI. P. 130–145. Daniélou J. La notion de confins (μεθpιοι) chez Grégoire de Nysse//Recherches de Science Religieuse. Paris, 1961. T. 49. P. 161–197. Daniélou J. La resurrection des corps chez Grégoire de Nysse//Vigilae Christianae. Amsterdam, 1953. 7. P. 154–170. Daniélou J. Le probleme du changement chez Grégoire de Nysse//Archives de Philosophic Pans, 1966. V. 29, 3. P. 323–347. Daniélou J. L " être et le temps chez Grégoire de Nysse. Leiden, 1970. Daniélou J. Metempsychosis in Gregory of Nyssa: The Heritage of the Early Church, Essais in Honor of George Florovsky//Orientalia Christiana Analecta. Roma, 1973. 195. P. 227–243. Daniélou J. Platonisme et theologie mystique. Essai sur la doctrine spirituelle de saint Grégoire de Nysse. Paris, 1944. Dennis J. T. St. Gregory of Nyssa " s Defence of the Doctrine of the Resurrection of Body//St. Vladimir Quarterly Review, 1977. 29. P. 76–104. Diekamp F. Die Grundlagen der Ethik bei Gregor von Nyssa. Münster, 1896. Dunstone A. The Atonement in Gregory of Nyssa. London, 1964. Ecriture et culture philosophique dans la pensée de Grégoire de Nysse: Actes de Colloque de Chevetogne. (M. Alexandre, M. Canevet, E. Corsini, J. Daniélou, M. van Parys). Leiden, 1971. Gaith J. La conception de la liberte chez Grégoire de Nysse. Paris, 1953. |
| E. The Paul of Acts: Essays in Literary Criticism, Rhetoric, and Theology. Tüb., 1999; Mitchell M. M. The Heavenly Trumpet: John Chrysostom and the Art of Pauline Interpretation. Tüb., 2000; Cirillo L. L " antipaolinismo nelle Pseudoclementine: Un riesame della questione//Verus Israel: Nuove prospettive sul giudeocristianesimo/Ed. G. Filoramo, C. Gianotto. Brescia, 2001. P. 280-303; Clark A. C. Parallel Lives: The Relation of Paul to the Apostles in the Lucan Perspective. Carlisle, 2001; Das Ende des Paulus: Historische, theologische und literaturgeschichtlische Aspekte/Hrsg. F. W. Horn. B.; N. Y., 2001; Löhr H. Zur Paulus-Notiz in I Clem 5. 5-7//Ibid. S. 197-213; Osborn E. Irenaeus of Lyons. Camb. etc., 2001; idem. Tertullian, First Theologian of the West. Camb., 20032; idem. Clement of Alexandria. Camb., 2005; Berding K. Polycarp and Paul: An Analysis of Their Literary and Theological Relationship in Light of Polycarp " s Use of Biblical and Extra-Biblical Literature. Leiden etc., 2002; idem. John or Paul?: Who Was Polycarp " s Mentor?//Tyndale Bull. L., 2008. Vol. 59. N 1. P. 135-143; Hartog P. Polycarp and the NT: The Occasion, Rhetoric, Theme, and Unity of the Epistle to the Philippians and Its Allusions to NT Literature. Tüb., 2002; Mount Ch. Pauline Christianity: Luke-Acts and the Legacy of Paul. Leiden etc., 2002; Padovese L. L " antipaulinisme chrétien au IIe siècle//RechSR. 2002. T. 90. N 3. P. 399-422; Barrett C. K. Pauline Controversies in the Post-Pauline Period// Idem. On Paul: Essays on His Life, Work, and Influence in the Early Church. L.; N. Y., 2003. P. 155-177; Bovon F. The Apostolic Memories in Ancient Christianity// Idem. Studies in Early Christianity. Tüb., 2003. P. 1-16; idem. Paul as Document and Paul as Monument// Idem. New Testament and Christian Apocrypha: Collected Studies II/Ed. G. E. Snyder. Tüb., 2009. P. 307-317; Burnet R. Épîtres et lettres, Ier-IIe siècle: De Paul de Tarse à Polycarpe de Smyrne. P., 2003; Roetzel C. J. Paul in the II Century//The Cambridge Companion to St. |
| 5 See R. Hugh Connolly, «On the Meaning of «Epiclesis " », Downside Review (January 1923): 28–43, written in reply to John Walton Tyrer, The Eucharistic Epiclesis (Liverpool: Longmans, Green, 1917); R. Hugh Connolly, «The Meaning of πκλησις: A Reply», Journal of Theological Studies 25 (1924): 337–364, written in reply to John Walton Tyrer, «The Meaning of πκλησις», ibid., 139–150. The two latter articles present a very detailed list of the contexts of the usage of πικαλεν/πικαλεσθαι and πικλησις in early Christianity. See also Odo Casel, «Zur Epiklese», Jahrbuch für Liturgiewissenschaft 3 (1923): 100–102; and idem, «Neue Beiträge zur Epiklese-frage», Jahrbuch für Liturgiewissenschaft 4 (1924): 169–178; and Johannes Betz, Die Eucharistie in der Zeit der griechischen Väter, Bd. I/1 (freiburg: Herder, 1955), 320–342. 6 It is noteworthy that in the Byzantine Eucharistic liturgies of BAS and CHR the verb πικαλεσθαι is used in both senses. In the ekphonesis before the Our Father it has the sense of «naming»: «And make us worthy, Master, with confidence and without fear of condemnation, to dare call You [πικαλεσθαι], the heavenly God, Father», while in the prayers of the clergy before the Great Entrance (i.e., in the so-called «prayers of the faithful», though the actual prayer of the laity is a litany read simultaneously with these) and after it (after the Great Entrance – only in CHR, before – in both BAS and CHR) it has the sense of «calling forth». 7 Greek text in Claude Jenkins, «Origen on I Corinthians, [part] III», Journal of Theological Studies 9 (1908): 502. On Origen as a witness to the Eucharistic theology and practice of his time see Harald Buchinger, «Early Eucharist in Transition? A Fresh Look at Origen», in Jewish and Christian Liturgy and Worship: New Insights into Its History and Interaction, ed. Albert Gerhards and Clemens Leonhard (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 207–227, and the literature indicated there. 8 ET from Albertus Frederik Johannes Klijn, The Acts of Thomas, 2 nd ed. (Leiden: Brill, 2003), 77. |
|
|
